China agreed to limit the growth in its exports of 10 textile and clothing products to the European Union to between eight and 12.5 percent a year, an EU diplomat close to the negotiations said on Friday.
World Trade organization(WTO) theory of globalization are base on Comparative Advatage theory. Under WTO agreement. Developed country like US and EU countries would remove trade barrier on labour intensive industry like textile on 1 Jan 2005. Whereas developing country like Malaysia would remove restriction on services industry like financial industry and legal profession on 2008.
Malaysia has well prepared on liberalisation of financial industry via consolidated all bank to 10 anchor bank. Overlap branch has been closed down and staff has been retrenched. Recently, Malaysia has issue 5 stock brokerage licenses to foreign stock broker in preparation of such liberalisation.
US and EU, apparently caught unprepared for liberalisation of labour intensive industry like textile industry. They start retrenchment only from 2005. They request to extent the full liberalisation 3 years to 2008.
Shouldnt they start preparing such liberalisation like Malaysia did for it financial industry?
Should Malaysia extent liberalisation of our services industry 3 years to 2011? It is not fair for Malaysia to liberalised its servies industry while developed country still protecting their labour intensive industry. They might seek extension again after 3 years while we have issue 5 foreign bokerage licenses and more?
Tag Economic : Economy
TechnoratiTag:Asia book books Business Commentary competitive Economics Economy Malaysia News and politics Opinion Politik Social World
2 comments:
I agree completely. Lets not liberalise finance. Lets liberalise automotive & steel instead.
I does not mean that.
It just that US and EU do not have competitive automobile and steel industry. They unable to compete against Japanese on both above industry. Like textile industry, they unable to even unable to compete against Malaysia's steel industry if they liberalise.
However, their Citibank is competitive and agreessive is pressuring government to liberalise.
Their legal profession's culture is too costlier for us. They sue people not neessary because they able to win. Sometime it just a delay technique. Our doctor might refuse to operate you if you never sign an indemnity agreement if their system is being adopted.
And they have too many lawyer waiting in hospital to pursuade a patient to sue their doctor.They also waiting for liberalisation to export their oversupply lawyer
Post a Comment